Solution slide
The data and methodology behind the four headline figures on the solution slide. Each figure is broken down into its inputs, assumptions, and source material.
Claim 1 — Transaction timeline baseline
16 weeks
Average time to complete a UK commercial property transaction today
What the claim covers
The 16-week figure represents the average elapsed time from agreed heads of terms to legal completion for a standard UK commercial letting or acquisition. It is the baseline against which Harla's 4-week target is measured.
Methodology
UK commercial property transactions involve six sequential workstreams — heads of terms negotiation, solicitor instruction and enquiries, searches and reports, KYC/AML compliance, conditions satisfaction, and completion. These typically run in series because each party waits on others: landlord solicitors wait for occupier KYC, search results delay title responses, and compliance conditions block exchange. The cumulative elapsed time across a standard transaction is 14–20 weeks, with 16 weeks as the commonly cited industry midpoint for straightforward commercial lettings.
Supporting data
- UK commercial property transaction timelines: typically 3–6 months for lettings, 4–6 months for acquisitions RICS — Commercial Property Due Diligence Guidance
- Average commercial letting completion: 14–18 weeks (landlord and occupier solicitors, searches, AML, conditions) British Property Federation — Transaction Efficiency
- KYC/AML process alone adds 2–4 weeks when handled manually across multiple parties Law Society — AML Guidance for Solicitors
- Search turnaround times vary by local authority: 5 days to 6 weeks HM Land Registry — Local Land Charges Programme
Claim 2 — Harla completion time
75% faster
4 weeks to completion versus the 16-week baseline
What the claim covers
Harla's platform targets completion in 4 weeks by running all four workstreams — Agree, Verify, Comply, and Complete — in parallel rather than sequentially. The 75% reduction (12 weeks saved out of 16) is derived from eliminating the serial waiting time between parties, not from making any individual task faster.
Methodology
Under the current sequential model, each party waits for a predecessor: heads of terms must be signed before solicitors are instructed, KYC must clear before exchange, searches must return before title can be approved. Harla starts all workstreams simultaneously at deal inception. KYC/AML is initiated on day one. Standardised heads of terms and boilerplate leases reduce negotiation from 3–4 weeks to days. Searches are ordered at instruction rather than after exchange. The result is that the critical path collapses from 16 weeks (sum of sequential stages) to approximately 4 weeks (the longest single parallel stage).
Supporting data
- Parallel processing of KYC and legal workstreams is the primary lever identified in RICS transaction efficiency research RICS — Real Estate Standards
- Standardised leases (e.g. BPF model leases) reduce heads of terms negotiation from 3–4 weeks to 3–5 days British Property Federation — Model Commercial Lease
- Digital KYC platforms reduce AML verification time from 2–4 weeks to 24–48 hours Law Society — Digital AML Verification
- HMLR's digital search programme targets 5-day search turnaround HM Land Registry — LLC Programme
Claim 3 — Landlord void cost saving
£45.5k
Saved per transaction for landlords by completing in 4 weeks instead of 16
What the claim covers
The £45.5k figure represents the direct void cost avoided by a landlord when a transaction completes 12 weeks earlier than the current average. It does not include indirect costs (agent fees, management overhead, deterioration) or the rental income upside — it is a conservative floor on the saving.
Methodology
The calculation applies the standard void cost model used by institutional property managers: passing rent plus irrecoverable property costs (service charge, business rates, insurance) for each week of void. Harla's 12-week saving is multiplied by a representative weekly void cost for a mid-market UK commercial unit.
| Input | Value |
|---|---|
| Representative unit size | ~6,000 sq ft |
| Passing rent (mid-market UK office/retail) | ~£32/sq ft/yr ≈ £3,692/wk |
| Additional irrecoverable costs (rates, insurance) | ~£100/wk |
| Total weekly void cost | ~£3,792/wk |
| Weeks saved (16 → 4) | 12 weeks |
| Total saving | £45,504 ≈ £45.5k |
Supporting data
- UK average commercial office rent (regional mid-market): £25–£45/sq ft/yr Cushman & Wakefield — UK MarketBeat 2025
- Void period costs for commercial landlords: rental income foregone plus irrecoverable service charges and rates RICS — Service Charge Management
- MSCI/IPF research: UK commercial void rates and holding costs by sector (offices, retail, industrial) Investment Property Forum — Research Programme
Claim 4 — Reduced solicitor costs
~£5.4k
Saving per transaction in reduced solicitor fees
What the claim covers
The ~£5.4k figure represents the reduction in solicitor fees when Harla handles the document preparation, precedent surfacing, and enquiry management that would otherwise be billed at hourly rates. It reflects the portion of solicitor time that is administrative rather than advisory — the work Harla automates.
Methodology
A standard commercial letting instruction to a mid-tier UK law firm typically incurs £7,000–£12,000 in total fees (both sides combined), with a significant proportion attributable to document management, enquiry handling, and condition tracking. Harla automates these tasks, reducing billable hours. The ~£5.4k saving assumes a base fee of approximately £8,000 reduced to approximately £2,600 — with the solicitor retained for advisory and sign-off functions only.
| Input | Value |
|---|---|
| Typical solicitor fee (one side, commercial letting) | ~£8,000 |
| Proportion attributable to document/enquiry admin | ~67% |
| Fee with Harla (advisory/sign-off only) | ~£2,600 |
| Saving per transaction | ~£5,400 |
Supporting data
- Commercial property solicitor fees (mid-tier UK firm): £3,000–£15,000 per side depending on complexity Law Society — Property Law Practice
- SRA transparency rules require publication of indicative fees for certain property transactions Solicitors Regulation Authority — Price Transparency
- Legal automation platforms reduce document preparation time by 50–80% Law Society — Legal Technology and AI
Source index
- RICS — Commercial Property Due Diligence Guidance
- British Property Federation — Transaction Efficiency
- British Property Federation — Model Commercial Lease
- Law Society — AML Guidance for Solicitors
- Law Society — Legal Technology and AI
- Solicitors Regulation Authority — Price Transparency
- HM Land Registry — Local Land Charges Digital Programme
- Cushman & Wakefield — UK MarketBeat 2025
- Investment Property Forum — Research Programme